Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| sumerian:number [2008/04/15 16:36] – created cale | sumerian:number [2008/08/14 12:30] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Like a number of languages in East Asia, Sumerian has an optional nominal suffix that indicates plurality, /-ene/. Only animate nouns and nominal phrases are capable of taking this suffix—inanimate nominals do not occur with the suffix. | Like a number of languages in East Asia, Sumerian has an optional nominal suffix that indicates plurality, /-ene/. Only animate nouns and nominal phrases are capable of taking this suffix—inanimate nominals do not occur with the suffix. | ||
| - | <b>dingir-re-ne</ | + | **dingir-re-ne** 'the gods' |
| Older accounts often describe the reduplication of inanimate nouns and nominal phrases as the primary mechanism for indicating the plurality of an inanimate being, but this is incorrect. It now seems fairly clear that reduplication of a nominal stem is a way of referring to all members of the class defined by the term. | Older accounts often describe the reduplication of inanimate nouns and nominal phrases as the primary mechanism for indicating the plurality of an inanimate being, but this is incorrect. It now seems fairly clear that reduplication of a nominal stem is a way of referring to all members of the class defined by the term. | ||
| - | <b>kur-kur</ | + | **kur-kur** 'all the mountains' |
| - | There is, however, another expression that can be used with inanimate nouns to indicate a kind of plurality, namely | + | There is, however, another expression that can be used with inanimate nouns to indicate a kind of plurality, namely |
| - | <b>udu hi-a</ | + | **udu hi-a** ' |
| Although these additional mechanisms can be used to indicate that more than one of some particular kind of entity exists, they are not, strictly speaking, forms of number marking. Particularly from a typological point of view, only the /-ene/ suffix is a true marker of plurality in the nominal part of the grammar. | Although these additional mechanisms can be used to indicate that more than one of some particular kind of entity exists, they are not, strictly speaking, forms of number marking. Particularly from a typological point of view, only the /-ene/ suffix is a true marker of plurality in the nominal part of the grammar. | ||
| == Bibliography == | == Bibliography == | ||
| - | *Schramm, Wolfgang. 1983. Die Pluralbildung der Nomina im Sumerischen. In <i>Althistorische Studien: Hermann Bengtson zum 70. Geburtstag dargebracht von Kollegen und Schülern</i>. Historia Einzelschriften 40. Eiesbaden, pp. 1-7. | + | |
| - | *Sollberger, | + | *Sollberger, |
| - | *Thomsen, Marie-Louise. 2001[1984]. | + | *Thomsen, Marie-Louise. 2001[1984]. |
