Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| types_of_lists [2016/04/19 16:29] – wagensonner | types_of_lists [2016/04/19 17:53] (current) – wagensonner | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Return to [[Lexical texts]] | ||
| + | |||
| ===== Types of lists ===== | ===== Types of lists ===== | ||
| Line 5: | Line 7: | ||
| The second type of lexical texts, usually called sign lists, concern lists, whose entries are (predominantly) organized according to the form and appearance of signs. As mentioned earlier, this interpretation does not exclude them from being a word list. On the contrary. Many thematic lists as well as other sub-categories of word lists use the acrographic principle for arranging entries, i.e., listing entries according to the first sign in each entry. At various sites in the course of the 3rd millennium a genre of lists emerged, which appear to share a common ancestor or - similar to the afore-mentioned Practical Vocabularies - a common idea. They organize entries according to a selection of signs (or groups of signs) in subsequent sections. Except for one example ([[http:// | The second type of lexical texts, usually called sign lists, concern lists, whose entries are (predominantly) organized according to the form and appearance of signs. As mentioned earlier, this interpretation does not exclude them from being a word list. On the contrary. Many thematic lists as well as other sub-categories of word lists use the acrographic principle for arranging entries, i.e., listing entries according to the first sign in each entry. At various sites in the course of the 3rd millennium a genre of lists emerged, which appear to share a common ancestor or - similar to the afore-mentioned Practical Vocabularies - a common idea. They organize entries according to a selection of signs (or groups of signs) in subsequent sections. Except for one example ([[http:// | ||
| - | In the early second millennium a list emerges, whose importance for the scribal education is evident based on its content. This list called // | + | In the early second millennium a list emerges, whose importance for the scribal education is evident based on its content. This list called // |
| + | |||
| + | There are quite a few further types of texts that belong to the genre of lexical lists. One among these is a // | ||
| + | |||
| + | \\ KW \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Return to [[Lexical texts]] | ||
